07.09.2025
14 min
Jamie AI vs Otter for Enterprise: Which One is the Best?
By Rodoshi
Growth Content Editor

Otter has long been the go-to option for teams who need meeting transcripts.
But in enterprise settings, when privacy concerns, admin control, and quality of notes become non-negotiable, things get more complicated.
Jamie AI is a newer player with a different take:
- No bots joining your calls
- GDPR-first infrastructure
- AI-generated summaries designed for decision-makers
So, Jamie or Otter, which one makes more sense for enterprise teams?
In this Jamie AI vs Otter comparison, I’ll keep aside the generic features and go straight into how these two stack up against each other for enterprise use.
You could be rolling out tools across a 500-person sales org, managing IT policies for thousands of employees, or ensuring compliance across global teams, this guide will help you choose the AI meeting assistant built to scale with enterprise needs.
Jamie vs Otter AI: Security and Compliance
Security is a top priority for enterprise teams evaluating meeting tools. Let’s look at how Jamie and Otter handle data privacy and compliance.
Jamie security features
Jamie is developed and hosted in Germany, operating under the strict standards of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Key protections include:
- Secure hosting in Frankfurt, where transcripts are stored and locally backed up
- No training on your data; even temporary processing via Anthropic’s API leaves no trace
- Strict internal protocols and ongoing security training for all team members
- Bot-free by default; Jamie does not join calls unless explicitly triggered by the user
For organizations with strict privacy policies or those operating across borders, Jamie’s architecture simplifies compliance while giving IT teams full visibility into where their data lives and how it’s handled.
Otter AI security features
Otter also offers a solid security framework, with controls that align with enterprise expectations:
- Regulatory compliance with GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA
- Two-factor authentication across all plans
- Data retention settings, including 30-day auto-deletion and manual purge options
- SSO and advanced admin controls available on the Enterprise tier
But Otter’s automation features can introduce operational risks if not configured carefully. Some users have reported OtterPilot joining meetings without consent, which could raise concerns in regulated industries.
To avoid such mishaps, you have to head over to Account Settings > Meetings, and manually toggle off Auto-join all meetings.
Also read: Otter AI Review: Is It Worth It in 2025?
Jamie vs Otter AI: Quality of Meeting Notes
The real test lies in whether the tool delivers usable, shareable, and actionable insights based on the conversations they capture. Let’s take a closer look at their pricing structure and what’s offered in the enterprise plan:
Jamie: High-quality, contextual, and structured notes
Jamie stands out for producing well-organized, actionable summaries that are tailored for business users. Jamie structures its output into:
- Clear bullet points
- Speaker-specific insights
- Action items, decisions, and tasks
Jamie mirrors what a human executive assistant might produce after a strategic meeting, making it especially useful for decision-makers who need to catch up quickly.
Check out this interactive demo to see how Jamie works:
Jamie performs reliably across different meeting types, with built-in speaker recognition.
The notes are optimized for readability and clarity, whether you're scanning highlights or sharing updates with stakeholders. The summaries are designed to be presentation-ready and require little to no editing.
With Jamie, you get multilingual support for 100+ languages, including Spanish, French, German, Japanese, and English, to mention a few. It understands many regional accents and dialects as well.
For enterprise teams handling high-stakes conversations like sales calls, product reviews, or leadership syncs, Jamie offers a real operational advantage.

Otter AI: Real-time transcripts but less-polished summary
Otter AI is fast and accessible, providing real-time transcription as the meeting unfolds.
Its core strength lies in how quickly it delivers a basic transcript and auto-summary, often within moments of a call ending. For teams who prioritize speed, this can be helpful in informal settings or internal check-ins.
However, Otter’s summaries often lack structure. The AI-generated overview is presented as a paragraph-style text block, and while you can skim it for context, it might require manual cleanup to segment key themes.
Speaker identification is available, but it’s not always consistent in fast-paced or overlapping dialogue.
Otter currently supports English (US) and British English (UK) regional accents, Spanish, and French. The language support feels limiting for global teams who need multilingual transcription and notes.
Otter is a better fit for teams that treat transcripts as raw material rather than finished outputs. It’s efficient, but less refined for cross-functional sharing or client-facing use cases.

The takeaway:
- Jamie’s meeting notes are structured, context-aware, and presentation-ready, and save time for enterprise teams who need clarity at scale
- Otter’s notes are faster to produce but less polished, often requiring manual effort to turn them into something actionable. Some users mention this issue:

“The summaries are vague and, at times, give inaccuracies. It certainly has miles to improve. We find ourselves rewriting and/or elaborating on notes.”
Capture your first meeting
Jamie transcribes your computer's audio directly, with no meeting bots joining your call. Available for MacOS and Windows.
Jamie vs Otter AI: Integration Capabilities
TL;DR
- Jamie works with all meeting platforms without integrations
- Otter offers wider integrations across CRMs and communication platforms
Jamie integrations
Jamie takes a unique approach: instead of relying on platform-specific plug-ins, it captures audio directly from your device, which means it works out of the box with any video platform: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Webex, Slack, and more.
There’s no need for host permissions or additional setup, which simplifies deployment across diverse teams and meeting types.
You can connect Jamie with Google or Outlook Calendar to ensure your meetings are tracked automatically and summaries are delivered without manual triggers.
Jamie also syncs with tools like Notion and OneNote so your notes live alongside your other documents, and you can copy-paste into apps like Linear or Todoist keeps formatting and task details intact.
How it works
- Connecting accounts: In Settings → Integrations, link your Google or Outlook calendar. For Notion, Jamie sets up a dedicated “Jamie notes” database. For OneNote, it creates a “My Jamie Notes → Meeting Notes” folder
- Sync options: Choose between automatic syncing right after a summary is ready or manual syncing from the meeting’s Share menu
- Example: After a meeting, Jamie can send your summary and transcript straight into Notion, where project managers and researchers can collaborate, while the original notes remain in Jamie
Supported apps
- Notion: Creates a dedicated notes database and syncs summaries
- OneNote: Adds a notes folder with auto or manual sync
- Copy-paste friendly: Works seamlessly with Notion, Linear, Todoist, Bear, Typora, and Ulysses, keeping formatting consistent and tasks clear
However, Jamie doesn’t currently offer deep integrations with CRMs or project management tools like HubSpot, Salesforce, or ClickUp. While its summaries are designed to be shareable, it may require a bit more manual effort to embed insights into broader workflows.
Otter AI integrations
Otter takes a more traditional SaaS route, offering native integrations with tools across the enterprise stack.
- Video conferencing: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams
- CRM platforms: Salesforce, HubSpot
- Calendars: Google Calendar, Outlook
- Collaboration tools: Slack, Google Docs, Notion, Asana, Jira
Thanks to these integrations, Otter is easier to plug into established workflows where meeting notes need to flow into deals, tickets, or documents.
But deeper integrations also mean more administrative overhead, especially if you’re rolling Otter out at scale across functions with different access levels.
The takeaway:
- If your priority is frictionless capture across any meeting format without worrying about app compatibility or guest permissions, Jamie offers a more flexible setup
- If you need tight integration across sales, product, and operations tools, Otter is a good option, but may require more upfront configuration
Jamie vs Otter AI: Pricing
- Jamie offers a generous free plan and transparent pricing, with unlimited storage and built-in privacy across all tiers; ideal for security-conscious teams
- Otter AI is more integration-heavy and budget-friendly at lower tiers, but its usage caps and admin complexity can add friction as you scale
Jamie pricing
Jamie offers flexible pricing to support everything from individual use to full-scale enterprise deployments, without compromising on privacy, scalability, or support.
FREE Plan (€0/month)
- 10 meeting credits per month
- 30-minute meeting duration limit
- AI-generated meeting notes
- Automatic action item extraction
- Complete meeting transcripts
- Speaker identification
- Calendar integration (Google & Outlook)
- Tag system
- Task management
- Advanced text editing
- Copy-paste integration
- Team workspace sharing
- No meeting bots required
- 100+ languages support
PLUS Plan (€25/month)
- 20 meeting credits per month
- 2-hour meeting duration limit
- Includes everything in FREE plan
PRO Plan (€47/month)
- Unlimited meeting credits
- 3-hour meeting duration limit
- Includes everything in PLUS plan
Team & Enterprise Plans
- Custom pricing
- Custom solutions
- Contact required for details
All plans include:
- Enterprise-grade security
- Unlimited storage
- GDPR-compliant infrastructure
- Full access to advanced AI features across online and in-person meetings

Otter AI pricing
Otter AI’s Basic tier is available for free, which offers AI meeting record, transcription, summary, and 300 monthly transcription minutes with a limit of 30 minutes per conversation. You can import and transcribe 3 audio or video files lifetime per use.
The paid plans are:
- Pro: $16.99/user per month. You get 1200 monthly transcription minutes with 90 minutes per conversation
- Business: $30/user per month. It makes you eligible for 6000 monthly transcription minutes with 4 hours per conversation. You can access a shared custom vocabulary, tag speakers, and assign action items to teammates
- Enterprise: Custom pricing. This plan offers company-wide deployment, video replay, along with advanced security and compliance control
What Are Real-Life Customers Saying About Otter AI vs Jamie?
TL;DR
- Jamie: Jamie is favored for its bot-free design, high-quality topic-based summaries, and reliable support for in-person and virtual meetings. Teams appreciate the clarity of its outputs, but it may require a short setup phase that allows Jamie to learn your internal vocabulary and speaker patterns
- Otter AI: Otter stands out for its real-time transcription and ability to auto-join scheduled meetings. Its live notes are useful for quick reference, but accuracy can dip during rapid exchanges or when speakers have varied accents. Some users also report that the onboarding process feels pushy
Jamie customer reviews
What users like:


Source: Reddit


Source: G2

Source: Reddit
What could be better:
- “Jamie excels in creating precise meeting summaries, but it’s worth noting that it shines brightest once it learns your specific terminology. This initial setup, requiring some hands-on input, is a small investment for the tailored accuracy and efficiency it offers in the long run.”
- “Nothing to complain about as of now, however, I think maybe they should adjust their pricing a bit, but that's my personal take.”
Source: G2
Otter AI customer reviews
What users love:
“I have been using the premium version for a long time now and recent upgrade in which AI helps you to extract required information from the conversation is extremely helpful. Exporting in different formats makes it quite easy to acquire the desired output. Dashboard is easy to use and it seems very welcoming to new users as well.”
“I like the summary section. I like how Otter AI goes through the entire meeting transcript and summarizes all the key talking points and if there is anything not listed you can edit the summary section to add it.”
“Personally, I love to use AI to ask for all the details about a certain point of the conversation and write emails based on the recording when necessary. “
What could be better:
- The transcripts and summaries are inaccurate at times
- The tool forces meeting participants to create a new account to view their notes
- Sometimes the tool automatically joins meetings even when you don’t want it to

“...The account signup process heavily pushes users to sign in with their Microsoft or Google credentials, provide access to calendars and contacts, and regulate to attend all meetings with a link. Most users have no idea they’ve done this, they’re just there for the meeting notes (at the prompting of a trusted colleague/earlier victim).”

“Sometimes, due to difference in accents and speed of talking it does not capture everything accurately, and even if the system does manage to catch a few words more often or not they are incorrect. It is frustrating at times when the tool will integrate automatically and even if one tried to remove it from a meeting, it's hard to kick out and will often send reminder in chat messages that can be disruptive to the flow.”
Final Verdict: Jamie AI or Otter, Which AI Meeting Tool Holds Up in Enterprise Environments?
Choose Jamie when:
- You need a bot-free meeting assistant
- Your organization values structured, actionable summaries that reduce manual cleanup
- You operate in regulated or security-sensitive environments where data control is non-negotiable
- You want a solution that works across in-person, hybrid, and remote setups without additional configuration
- You’re scaling across departments and prefer a non-disruptive rollout with minimal IT overhead
Choose Otter when:
- Your team prioritizes real-time transcription
- You rely on native integrations with CRM and collaboration tools, and have workflows built around them
- Your team doesn’t mind manually cleaning up or restructuring notes after the meeting
For enterprise teams, the decision between Jamie and Otter comes down to how much control, clarity, and compliance you need at scale.
Otter is a capable tool for real-time transcription and integrates well across popular CRMs and productivity platforms. But it comes with trade-offs: inconsistent summaries, auto-joining feature that raises privacy concerns, and the need for manual cleanup before notes are ready to share.
Jamie, on the other hand, is built with clarity and privacy in mind. It delivers structured summaries, safeguards your data, and adapts across meeting formats, without getting in the way.
If you’re rolling out at scale and need a tool that keeps pace with enterprise standards, Jamie is built for the job.
Download Jamie for free to experience it yourself (no credit card details needed)!
Or if you’d like to see the tool in action before making a move, book a free demo.
Capture your first meeting
Jamie transcribes your computer's audio directly, with no meeting bots joining your call. Available for MacOS and Windows.
Read More
- Otter AI vs Jamie: Which One is Better for Meeting Summaries?
- Otter AI vs. Fireflies AI vs. Jamie: Which One Is Better in 2025?
- Otter AI vs Notta vs Jamie: Which one is better in 2025?
- 13 Best Otter AI Alternatives & Competitors in 2025 [Updated April]
- 7 Best Chorus Alternatives & Competitors in 2025
- The 10 Best Meeting Minutes Software in 2025
- 10 Best Speech-to-Text Software for 2025
- 10 Best Automated Meeting Notes Tools to Save You Hours in 2025
- The 10 Best AI Meeting Assistants for 2025
- 7 Best AI Note Takers in 2025 [Updated March]
FAQs
1. How does security compare in Jamie AI vs Otter for Enterprise?
When it comes to security, Jamie takes a strict GDPR-first approach. It’s hosted in Germany, uses AES encryption, and is bot free by default so it only joins meetings when invited. Otter AI also meets GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA requirements, but some users have reported its live transcription joining calls automatically if not turned off in settings, which is something enterprises in regulated industries may want to watch out for.
2. Which tool delivers better meeting summaries for enterprise teams?
Jamie excels in creating precise meeting summaries that include bullet points, decisions, and speaker identification: the kind of polished output you could share with leadership without edits. Otter AI offers fast live transcription and quick summaries, but they tend to be less structured, so teams may need to spend extra time cleaning them up.
3. What are the key features Otter AI vs Jamie offer?
Both Otter and Jamie work with all major video conferencing platforms like Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Jamie integrates with Notion and OneNote and supports offline transcription. Otter AI, on the other hand, connects with CRMs, project management tools, and offers richer collaboration features. If you want a plug-and-play AI note taker, Jamie is simpler; if deep integrations matter, Otter is a good fit.
4. How does the pricing of Otter AI vs Jamie compare?
Otter AI pricing starts with a free plan that gives you 300 monthly transcription minutes, then moves to Pro ($16.99/month), Business ($30/month), and custom enterprise quotes. Jamie’s plans start free with 10 summaries/month, then scale up to Standard (€25), Pro (€47), and custom enterprise options. Otter is more budget-friendly at lower tiers, but Jamie includes advanced features and enterprise-grade privacy at every level.
5. Which AI note taker has better transcription accuracy?
Jamie is known for high transcription accuracy across accents and even in noisy environments or multi-speaker meetings. Otter AI performs well for live transcription, but some customers say it can miss words on slow networks or when multiple people talk over each other.
6. Can I use them without an internet connection?
Jamie supports offline transcription, so you can take meeting notes even for in-person meetings. Otter AI needs a stable internet connection for live transcription and note generation.
7. What do users love about Otter AI vs Jamie?
In Otter AI reviews, users love its real-time capture, search tools, and ability to transcribe, summarize, and detect key moments. Jamie users highlight its bot-free design, high-quality summaries, and Jamie’s AI chat for quick follow-ups on meeting content.
8. Otter vs Jamie: Which one should I choose for my enterprise?
If you need deep integrations with CRMs, collaboration tools, and heavy video conferencing workflows, Otter AI is a strong choice. If you want a note taking tool that works anywhere, keeps your data private, and produces best in class summaries, Jamie might be the better fit.
Rodoshi Das is a Growth Content Editor at Jamie. With a marketer’s mindset and a researcher’s curiosity, she crafts product-led B2B SaaS content that drives results. When she’s not brainstorming strategies, you’ll find her lost in her books, rewatching The Office for the hundredth time, or planning her itinerary for a trip to the mountains.